Today I was talking with a very smart Canadian girl about dating, something usually frustrating but unfortunately necessary for most people. I have to confess that I’ve been out of the dating market for decades now, not for being committed to any monogamist relationship (I don’t do that) but just because I feel very silly in dating situations, dealing with ordinary people and their mentality. It just doesn’t work for me. It actually disgusts me.
Of course, a thoughtful person come from a poor chauvinistic culture where women must find a provider while they’re still attractive and have something (beauty) to offer to a well-paid bachelor (or divorced older guy) would be disgusted at all those games and tactics involved in this transaction generically called “dating” and later “relationship” or even “love”, if the operations are successful.
What disgusts me is the fact that people clinically measure themselves in terms of attractiveness, conformity to social requirements and mainly potential to become stable homemakers, breadwinners, in the context of a nuclear bourgeois family. And, in order to be successful, they all have to build themselves in every aspect to be eligible. It’s as if they were in a game show, where the right answers will allow them to proceed to the next stage. In the end, we have to navigate in a sea of phoneys and posers as we try to pick the most promising to our nuclear family-oriented goals, while we say we’re just trying to “meet someone nice” or “have fun”. It just doesn’t sound authentic, spontaneous or fun to me. At least to start, competent guys must not perspire their horniness and the girls their urge to get their men. Why doesn’t it feel authentic? Since when, in order to “meet someone nice” or “have fun”, we must commit our freedom, follow rituals, display power, use sex as reward or consider financial issues, always considering long-term socially-defined goals? Never in my own personal world, where I live almost by myself, of course. It just doesn’t make sense to me. Ok, I’m weird, maybe stupid.
However, in the developed, post-feminist west, where women don’t really need a provider in order to have a decent life standard it should be different. But, not really. The urges and the games are the same. And that’s disappointing. Well, I’m not so dumb or naive to really believe it would be really different, but still, I didn’t expect quite the same thing. It’s relatively easy to understand though. Romantic, monogamist, bourgeois, family-oriented models are not a mere method we use to oppress each other, but the very essence of the social paradigms that govern people’s lives and shape their minds in our society and that’s what keeps it the way it is. They actually dictate how we must live and for what. And the rules must be undisputed and obediently followed, even by the smart ones! It includes following all the rituals and having what it takes to “succeed”, no matter how limiting, stressful, empty, uninvestigated and artificial everything is. Now, surprisingly or not, people do look happy or satisfied conforming to all of this. Just like when they consume. Well, at least way happier or more satisfied than those who fail to.
In the end, social rules, rituals and values contain any educated and intelligent questioning within the safe limits of the speech and mental exercise of those few who are able and dare to question them, even though they will still follow them. Ultimately, “better conformed than sorry” is the ideal to keep in mind when it comes to actions and attitude. Otherwise, you’re almost totally on your own and it’s not desirable. Being single and not having a no-sex marriage, no-fun, standard family lifestyle after a certain age is a very uncomfortable stigma and an unbearable idea. Except to stubborn freaks such as I.